This is an archive of a previous version of Sodarace.

Please visit http://sodarace.net for the latest version.

forum  |  »» sodaplay
 
»» forums  »» sodarace league forum

subject: AmeobaRace

271 replies on 19 pages. most recent reply: 13-Aug-07 22:55 by edlinfan

»» back to topic list  

This topic has 271 replies on 19 pages [ « | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19  | » ]
»» previous topic   »» next topic  


KingSolomon

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 29-Nov-03 22:56   »» 
Here is my main point.

Computers need a problem to solve, or something to combine, or generate from previously inputted knowledge, whereas humans can simply create. I was talking with Clonetrooper and he said this:
A human can develop something from nothing, with no outside imput, but a computer cannot. Someone, a human, specifically, must first give it a program to run.

So you see, humans have the ability to create from their heart and mind, while computers need information input into them. If you say to a computer: "Create something," it will ask, "With what? For what purpose? Using what information?"

Chirag

»» models
»» homepage

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 29-Nov-03 23:13   »» 
ok i will do that. My algorithm cant do that yet but when it can i'll be sure to let u know.

About creativity. Creativity stems from the ability of someone to learn from whats around them and learn from ones mistakes. Read what ive written previously more carefully.

KingSolomon

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 29-Nov-03 23:24   »» 
I have read your posts carefully several times.

Creativity comes from INSIDE someone, not from outside. And since computers cannot produce something without outside input, they cannot have the creativity of humans.

jpmay

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 29-Nov-03 23:40   »» 
Creativity may be no more than the brain making random links between randomly accumulated data.

Kinda takes the romance out of it, but its an idea you should consider. After all, the human brain is just a meat computer developed through random experimentation.

It may, however, be a while before computers are anywhere near as sophisticated as the human mind when it comes to abstract thought and creativity.

Veret

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 13:09   »» 
i think you both make good points. creativity, and for that matter, the human brain, are not all they're cracked up to be. On the other hand, all that computer scientists have been able to do so far is give the computers more processing power and more abilities, etc. this is great, but they haven't, nor will they, ever be able to make a computer that, as stated above, can do or make something without any input whatsoever. a computer is as its name suggests: something that computes, nothing more.

Chirag

»» models
»» homepage

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 17:13   »» 
Creativity is something that is learnt. We're not born with it. It is our ability to learn that gives us the power of creativity. Every intelligent thing operates on input. What point are you trying to make kingsolomon? You have eyes that allow you to see your models. Thats input into your brain. You SEE the time a model you race finishes in so u know if u need to make it better, Your trying to tell me YOU can be creative without input from the outside world?

I'll give you an example to show you how creativity is learnt. If you were to put a new born child in front of a pc running the sodaconstructor app, what do they do? what would they create? nothing, they'd probably try and eat the mouse if anything. Now if you were to put a ten year old in front of a pc running the sodaconstructor for the first time, it would be different. This child wouldve learnt enough about the world to interact with the pc, learnt about shapes to start drawing some boxes or whatever maybe even get a basic model moving. But the only way it couldve done this is by learning about the world, knowing about shapes springs and such. Without this knowledge the child would be no more creative than the baby. Now finally take a veteran constructor, someone who has a couple of years of experience with the soda app. This person has learnt about zip springs and all the rest. You would consider this person to be more creative because they are able to build more beautiful , faster and elegant models than the other two kids. Im not saying the other two kids wont EVER be as creative, but they have to learn certain things to able to creative. Now this is has nothing to do with age. You put an old caveman infront of the pc , he'd probably use it to break something.

The thing i think that is hindering you from seeing my point of view is that the programs you've come across, are one that just process data given by you. Games , office programs etx. This is what computers are mainly used for and all you see them are as tools for this. The genetic algorithms we are trying to develop are nothing like this. They operate on the exact same input as humans. Well not my one yet, but wwans algorithm that created models from scratch. All the input it was given was the same as a human. It was given the ability to know the time a model finished in (something YOU see), the ability to send models to the race app for testing, (something you've learned to do), and most importantly it is given the ability to learn what kind of model produces a fast time. Creativity does come from the inside, but you have to draw on the experiences you've learnt frmo the world to be able to so. No one is instantly creative.

Now one more point i think i should make. You think a computer cant make fine art? It could but you'd have to tell it what fine art is. You have to let it have the ability to judge something it has created so it knows it has produced fine art. It can judge sodarace models very easily. The lower the time the better, but finding some piece of art beautiful involves such a complex set of thought processes that often humans cant even agree with each other. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It'd be very difficult to but not impossible to teach (not give) a computer this kind of judgement.

Thats the key to true AI. Giving a computer the same ability to learn we have. Thats what our brains are, complex organic computers that have the ability to process INPUT from the outside world and learn.

Ok i'll make one more point about how new ideas come about and i'll draw a comparison to evolution like i did before. Evolution works because when two things breed the result is a creature that slightly different from the parents. Its genes may have been mutated slightly. Now if the change is bad, the creature has a lower chance of survival and is less likely to reproduce. If the change is good it will more likely survive and pass on these good traits.
The formation of new ideas in your head works in a similar way. When thinking of a solution to a problem, yoy may think of a few ideas , and then pick one idea you think is the best discarding the rest for now. The best solution in your opinion has survived. You may test this solution and realise it wasnt as good as you thought and you discard it. This can be a very rapid process, you dont even conciously realise you're doing it, but thats how your mind works. You will eventually , maybe very quickly come across a good solution and you keep it. This solution survives in your memory. Eventually you'll build up a whole population of good solutions in your head that will allow you to solve more complex problems. When it comes to solving complex problems you draw on the knowledge you've learned naturally, you dont ever once stop to appreciate how your mind got to that state, how it learnt to be creative. Dont you think that its possible for a computer to be able to learn in this exact same way? Also you have to seperate two things:

1. Creativity in art
2. Creativity in solving a problem

ive shows you how humans develop creativity to solve problems, and you should accept that one day AI will be able to do the same thing, probably better.

however Creativity in art is something that only a human can do because you have to be human to be able to understand what you find artistic. Its something very specific to humans and individual humans even. Its not something computers can really do unless you simulate a human brain perfectly (which is theorectically feasible).

I know its a sad thing to argue that human creativity isnt so magical. Dont get me wrong im human myself. Id rather believe that there was something magical about the human mind, but i have to conclude. There isnt.

Veret

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 17:27   »» 
yet again, chirag, a number of very good points. this is why i said before that the human brain is not all it is cracked up to be. creativity, however, is not just how you have described it. that is one PART of it, but not the whole. I realize i must sound like a hopeless romantic here, but i would have to say that the other part is imagination. imagination is not just thoughts produced as a result of inputs, but it is something that originates ENTIRELY in the mind (notice i did not say brain here). granted, with the right materials, a lot of time, and a vast amount of knowledge and technology, you could build an exact working model of a human brain. it could do practically anything the real brain can do, but you would not be able to duplicate creativity, because that is a part of the mind and not just of the material brain. corny? yes. but you must admit there is some truth to the idea that not all of intelligent thought is from nothing more than a very advanced computation organ.
(did that make any sense? i feel like we're going in circles here)

Chirag

»» models
»» homepage

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 18:05   »» 
yes we are going in circles. To agree with my argument you have to first agree that the human mind is just a collection of interacting brain cells. We have no soul as such , we dont have some magical part of us that is not actually physically manifested in this world which would gives us that imagination. That kinda thing is a big question and for now since we cant prove the argument either way its just a question of belief. I dont believe that such a thing exists. i dont believe in god. i do believe in evolution. If you dont agree with me on those points in the first place we cant even argue about imagination and creativity. Ive said all i can say on the matter. I probably couldve expressed myself slightly better , my english aint that great but i have nothing more to add to his debate. I leave it to u to either agree or disagree with me. Tho id be curious to know wether ive changed your opinions about the mind, however slight.

Veret

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 18:12   »» 
yes, this whole thing is really just a conjecture for now, and yes you have changed some of my opinions, merely by getting me to actually sit down ant think of them. I still don't agree with you however, on the topic of the mind. i don't know if you used the word mind there for lack of a better one, but I believe that, while the mind is physically manifest, it is not duplicable. the BRAIN is certainly just a very large and complex computer, but i think that it is really just a sort of meduim for the mind. some actions, mostly the instinctive ones, are just a quick computation done by the brain with the given input, but also some actions such as those that we have time to ponder, are not really quite as simple to explain, and most likely were influenced by the part of our thought that is not a large and organic calculator, what i call the mind.

Veret

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 18:14   »» 
and so now that we have thoroughly exhausted this topic and i have philosophy coming out of my ears, why don't you get that admirable program of yours working on the race i gave you?

KingSolomon

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 30-Nov-03 19:47   »» 
I just read all that. It seems we've reached the root of the argument, so I'm going to stop and have my opinion, while you have yours. Bye.

lxmorj

»» models
»» homepage

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 03-Dec-03 03:17   »» 
creativity/imagination/ all that stuff is just random impulses firing. example- try and think of absolutly nothing. Its damn hard unless your a Zen monk. And they dont have the internet

lxmorj

»» models
»» homepage

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 03-Dec-03 03:18   »» 
jpmay pretty much said the same b4

Veret

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 03-Dec-03 12:28   »» 
Another thing that ws said b4 is that we can all have our own opinion, and i dont think any1 is going 2 change any1 elses right now

Demon_Biker

»» models

Re: AmeobaRace   posted: 04-Dec-03 18:02   »» 
I will race you with my DemonKiller



This topic has 271 replies on 19 pages [ « | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19  | » ]


»» previous topic   »» next topic  

»» back to topic list  »» top of the page  

PLEASE READ THE FORUM GUIDELINES AND ALWAYS PREVIEW TO CHECK MESSAGES BEFORE POSTING...
...Help keep our forums creative and constructive. Thank you.


»» forum home